Archive for February, 2010

What You Talkin’ Bout Willis?: Discussing Black Male Privilege, A Series

Posted in Uncategorized on February 25, 2010 by thebibliophile

Man thinks about a little baby girls and a baby boys
Man makes then happy ’cause man makes them toys
And after man has made everything, everything he can
You know that man makes money to buy from other man

This is a man’s world
But it wouldn’t be nothing, nothing without a woman or a girl

He’s lost in the wilderness
He’s lost in bitterness

-James Brown, “This is a Man’s World” 

I have great belief in the fact that whenever there is chaos, it creates wonderful thinking. I consider chaos a gift.
Septima Clark

 In 2008, author, sociologist, gender analyst, and Social Worker Jewel Woods published “The Black Male Privileges Checklist,” a list of 94 privileges that Black men have access to that Black womyn do not. Woods’ list hews closely to, and is modeled after, the groundbreaking essay by Peggy McIntosh entitled, “Unpacking the Knapsack of Unearned White Privilege” in which McIntosh reviewed the ways that she could move through the world as a white person, in ways that were denied to people of color.

 Woods comprehensive list of privileges which he can access as a Black male include:

  • I don’t have to choose my race over my sex in political matters.
  • When I read African American History textbooks, I will learn mainly about black men.
  • I have the ability to define black women’s beauty by European standards in terms of skin tone, hair, and body size. In comparison, black women rarely define me by European standards of beauty in terms of skin tone, hair, or body size.

It mirrors McIntosh’s list which outlines 50 areas of white privilege, including:

  • I can if I wish arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time.
  • I can avoid spending time with people whom I was trained to mistrust and who have learned to mistrust my kind or me.
  • When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.

Both lists work to lay bare the day-to-day realities of privilege. With one substantial difference – many of us understand and accept, know intimately even, the reality of white privilege, but the idea of Black male privilege, smacks of contradiction.

Or does it? Over the next few weeks here at thebibliophile, I’ll be investigating ideas around gender, particularly:

  • Woods’ work on Black male privilege
  • Male privilege and intersectionality
  • Male privilege and popular culture

I invite you to read, engage, and comment as the series of posts develop.

Black Male Privilege & Contradiction

 Is the idea of black male privilege a contradiction? The initial reaction to Black male privilege, for me, was to wonder, why Woods uses a marked term. In literary theory, a marked term is a term, 

“that has some limitation or boundary in its meaning when contrasted with an unmarked word [term] without such a limitation or boundary. Algeo points to the example of stallion (marked for male gender) and mare (marked for female gender) in contrast to the word horse, which is unmarked for gender.”*

In other words, Woods marks the term “male privilege” because he is drawing out male privilege as it is played out within a particular cultural context – the male privilege that is specific to Black socio-political realities and culture. I don’t think the idea of Black male privilege (BMP) is a contradiction, but I do think we have been conditioned to think of Black men as being in (constant) crisis, and as a result, discussing male privilege, in a meaningful way, in the Black community, becomes a crisis in and of itself.

Woods’ list, I think, raises uncomfortable, difficult, and challenging questions – even as he himself misses a vitally important marker: heterosexual and biologically-born male. Male privilege is not bestowed on all men equally. Men of color, differently-abled men, men from low-income backgrounds, transmen, gay men, or men who are deemed effeminate are often barred from full enfranchisement of male privilege.

That is why Woods’ carefully constructs a list that is appropriate for Black men – that takes into account that all men are not treated equally, while calling men to be accountable for working for their own privilege.

By removing the ability for readers to say, “As a Black man, I don’t have privileges” (read white privilege), Woods forces us to consider some key questions. For instance,

 1. If Woods is speaking primarily of male privilege, why does he mark it as “Black male privilege,” why not simply call it male privilege?

 2. What does it mean to speak about the ways that men in the Black community have privilege based on their gender?

 3. What does it mean to consider Black male privilege through a heterosexual lens? Do all Black men have the same access to male privilege?

 4. How could a discussion of male privilege shift conversations about racism?

 5. How can we as a community of Black people have a conversation about Black male privilege, without blaming or alienating Black men?

Understanding Male Privilege

For Woods’ work to have meaning and value, I think it’s important to understand male privilege. Diversity practitioners like Paul Kivel have long discussed male privilege which include the privileges to as one man wrote:

  • I have the privilege of being unaware of my male privilege.  
  • If I have children with a wife or girlfriend, and it turns out that one of us needs to make career sacrifices to raise the kids, chances are we’ll both assume the career sacrificed should be hers.
  • I will never be expected to change my name upon marriage or questioned if I don’t change my name.
  • My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favor. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed.
  • When I ask to see “the person in charge,” odds are I will face a person of my own sex. The higher-up in the organization the person is, the surer I can be.

Male privilege, like white privilege is a series of unearned benefits that are bestowed upon those who are seen as having power and social value, often based on systemic disenfranchisement and injustice.

The idea and work around Black male privilege, seems to me, to be a worthy conversation – even as the very idea of even discussing Black male privilege treads in race traitor territory. Statistics suggest that Black men are in crisis: 1 in 3 Black men between 20 and 29 are involved with the criminal justice system, Black male unemployment reached 15% in 2009, only 3 out of every 100 Black male kindergartners will graduate from college, only 41% of Black men graduate from high school, 1.46 million men out of a population of 10.4 million have lost the right to vote due to a felony conviction.** The statistics go on and on and on….Determined to drive home the narrative of Black male crisis.

To paraphrase, NPR Tell Me More host Michel Martin, can I just tell you, that Black men have been in crisis since we got off those boats? And collectively, men and womyn have been working to achieve racial justice in this country for centuries. There have been marches, forums, reconciliation meetings, apologies, lawsuits, standoffs, R. Kelley, and books upon books, on top of essays, and layered with treatises. Yet, in 2010, with a Black male President of the United States, Black men remain in crisis.

Who benefits from the narrative of Black male crisis? And when do we begin to return to language that acknowledges systemic oppression as contributing factors to Black male statistics, instead of pathologizing Black men, and ultimately the people who birth (and often raise) Black men: Black womyn?

Can I submit to you, that we as a people will remain in crisis until we deal with the very real crises of oppression within our midst; until we confront gender, homophobia, and classism. And yet, as I write this, I have a hard time finding my voice. I’m worried that I will be seen as blaming Black men, hostile, a man-hater, somehow betraying the race. And I’m a womynist! I spell womyn with a “y”!

But that’s how deep it goes. I wonder, how many other womyn and men, feel silenced into not discussing the very real presence of black heterosexual male privilege – there must be legions of us. And why is there such resistance to having the conversation.  I can understand the reluctance to discuss white privilege on the part of many white people, but to intimately know and understand the impact of privilege, recognize that you have a privilege and then decide not to address that privilege, I’m completely and utterly confounded by that. After all, this is well-worn terrain. First groved into place in the 19th Century in battles for voting rights of Black people and womyn, later during the Civil Rights’ Movement, then most explosively when Alice Walker published A Color Purple, and again during the Anita Hill hearings. Why do we keep delaying this conversation and the work that must be attached to such dialogue?

What Woods offers then, is the opportunity to have a dialogue about the ways that privilege also plays a role in the statistics regarding Black men, particularly highlighting that once a Black man makes it through the gauntlet – graduates from high school, avoiding the criminal justice system, teen or early adult parenthood, homicide, makes it through college, and perhaps even to graduate study, that Black male will indeed face racism along his path, but he will also gain  access to a great deal of privilege. And according to Woods, he may be far less likely to act in ways that do not reify male domination and power, particularly when it comes to womyn, and even more so, when dealing with Black womyn. He will in short, benefit from a great deal of intraracial privilege.

Dr. R. L’Heureux Lewis, is his Founder’s Day speech at Morehouse earlier this week, sought to address BMP. He recounted a story in which Dr. Martin Luther King read aloud a letter from Septima Clark, suggesting that Dr. King put womyn in charge of organizing and leading marches in the south. Dr. King did indeed read Clark’s letter, but as the story goes, he read it aloud at an SCLC meeting, to laughter. What does that mean? How can we balance the idea of the lofty goal of equality with the realities of exclusion? What happens when people we revere, are unable to see an aspect of oppression in their own midst?

What does it mean when we are trapped so that as Patricia Hill Collins explains we see,

 “Whiteness for feminist thought, maleness for Black social and political thought, and the combination for mainstream scholarship – all negate Black women’s realities. “***  

 While we as a community of Black people speak about issues of race and white privilege, we speak far less about issues within our own community; specifically the uneven dichotomy that demands justice based on race, and ignores or deems as culturally appropriate, injustice within our own communities based on gender.

 Putting It In Context

 When Chris Brown assaulted, (yes I brought up Chris Brown!) Rihanna, I waited and waited and waited for a prominent Black male to speak on domestic violence. When John Mayer let us all know about his white supremacist anatomy, I waited for one of the many Black male artists who have collaborated with him to say something? I mean, where was Kanye, that man is always running his mouth, where was he on this one? There was no real conversation. Oh sure, lots of blaming, many equivocal statements, but not a decision to put it on the line. No one was willing to go on national television and say “Hip-hop doesn’t care about Black womyn.”

I guess I am going to have to remain disappointed. Because when it comes to discussions about gender, our community, not just men, but the our communities for the most part, remain woefully unsophisticated in its understandings about gender. And when we do not step it up, to have more progressive, nuanced, liberated understandings, we end up getting played.

 We have swallowed the internalized oppression that teaches us that heterosexual men as the dominant figure in a community, equals healthy society, even as we supposedly refute and refuse white cultural ways of being. It seems we are unable to follow the suggestion of Malcolm X that,

“We ourselves have to lift the level of our community, take the standards of our community to a higher level, make our own society beautiful so that we will be satisfied…we’ve got to change our own minds about each other. We have to see each other with new eyes…we have to come together with warmth.”

 That ultimately instead of attempting to mirror white structures of power or culture, to truly be liberated, we need to think creatively about what culture and community we need, what is healthy, what is just, what is progressive? What will allow us to share and model equitable uses of power, and not just replicate a culture that never had our success in mind in the first place?

 But in Africa…

In Africa, what? My favorite argument regarding oppressive gender dynamics in the Black community involves the phrase “that in Africa we did…” In Africa men were kings over everything, especially womyn. In Africa, Black womyn didn’t have any attitude. In Africa, Black womyn didn’t complain. This is wholly inaccurate, it’s irritating as all get out. For one, Africa, is not a country, it is a continent with 52 countries, several thousand languages, many cultures, and 10,000 years of art and civilization. Not to mention a substantial history of cultural groups that recognized more than one gender.

Beyond the obvious problems of inaccuracy, this statement romanticizes Africa, even as it remains hostile to the realities of actual people from the continent of Africa, by erasing the cultural and individual differences and longings of people from the contient. The continent of Africa was impacted by European contact, just as those who were transported across the sea were. To assume that gender is an uncontested terrain in African nations, eclipses the realities of millions of people – and it utilizes the powerful tool of monolithizing a people. Moreover, it misrepresents the history of the African continent, at the same time that it is being used to silence those within the community who raise uncomfortable issues that challenge power structures, that if we are honest, really are no longer working for us.

One has only to look to Uganda, where a law is pending that would use the death penalty to punish citizens who are gay, lesbian, or bisexual to understand that gender, gender identity, and sexuality are not only contested, but in many ways basic human rights are being challenged.

Unless what you have to say is, “but in Africa…” many countries are still working to overcome systemic oppression as the result of colonialism, or “but in Africa…”, particularly Rwanda, there have been great attempts at micro-lending to increase wealth, and womyn are creating safe havens for other womyn, then the “But in Africa,” back in the day statement, really isn’t of any good use. Because it also doesn’t allow Black people to evolve. It chains us to an imagined past, when in the very real future, we have work to do.

Equity in Practice

I’m not naive enough to think that if we all stop doing the two-step to “Dance in the Name of Love,” that gender within the Black community will be solved. But I do think the very simple act of engagement, what is called in Buddhism, mindfulness, can suggest a path that gets us to at the very least be thoughtfully conscious about the culture we are supporting or consuming. And ultimately remind us, that back in Africa, in the day, we had many different ways of being, and so many building blocks from which to create beloved community.

Here are some places where we can start:

1. Read Jewel Woods list of Black Male Privileges and Peggy McIntosh’s work.

2. Set aside time to really think about the list. Journal about it, talk to a friend about it. What are your reactions? What do you disagree with and why? Are you willing to make changes?

3. Take a moment to look at what media you consume? How are womyn portrayed?

4. Ask yourself, “do I have different standards for men and womyn?”

5. Gather a group of friends and have a dialogue about the list. You can do it over dinner, FaceBook, Twitter, or email.

And maybe Huey(as voiced by Regina King) said it best….

http://www.youtube.com/watch#playnext=1&playnext_from=TL&videos=M-NPW5OEZFI&v=aXa9_XGBt_g

In a few days, talking about Lil Wayne, Tiger Woods, and sexuality….

* Western Literature in Context, Volume I (Davis, 1994, 323)

** Statistics from Black Male Community Empowerment Forum – http://morehousemaleinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/stats-on-aa-males2.pdf

***Patricia Hill Collins (2000, 12)

Posted in Uncategorized on February 24, 2010 by thebibliophile

Malcolm X

 

Shani Davis Takes Gold

Posted in Uncategorized on February 18, 2010 by thebibliophile

 

Olympian Shani Davis

Davis is quoted as having said, “I’ve lived 27 years of my life and I have self worth and I know what I am as a person. I don’t need anyone to define that for me if they’re paying attention to me once every four years, or just these two weeks of the Olympics. I already have my self-definition, and I’m quite happy with it.”

Learn more about Shani Davis on his website. I admit, I don’t know much (read, anything) about this sport, but there is a beauty in watching speed skating. I also find it interesting the way that Davis is treated in the media and by the press in juxtaposition to other Olympians.

Crochet Me: The Art of Jo Hamilton

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on February 16, 2010 by thebibliophile

Portland based artist Jo Hamilton creates portraits using crochet. Her portraits are innovative, accurate and photographic in their accuracy. Hamilton was recently profiled in Interweave Crochet’s Winter 2009 magazine.  Hamilton crochets her portraits from photographs. She first learned to crochet at the age of 6 from her grandmother. Originally trained as a painter, she  was inspired to begin potraiture and work in crochet after seeing an exhibit at the Museum of Contemporary Craft  (the website is great by the way) in Portland in 2006. The exhibit, “New Embroidery: Not Your Grandma’s Doily,” was designed to explore “contemporary approaches to embroidery, revealing surprising, humorous, even subversive imagery executed in thread upon vintage fabrics. The curators have carefully selected artists who explore this innovative approach to a traditional handcraft and its intersection with a third wave of feminism that often rejects the movement’s moniker.”

The detail, vibrancy, texture and suggestion of light and shadow which Hamilton is able to achieve fascinates me. Both the Museum of Contemporary Craft and Hamilton’s art raise some interesting questions:

1. What separates craft from being recognized as “art”?

2. In that separation why are womyn and people of color so often placed on the “crafters” side of that divide, even as our work influences mainstream and accepted “art”?

3. If crafts, like needlepoint, stitch work, require time, skill, and technique, why are they called crafts? If this is because “crafts” are understood to be for personal and daily use, then I think there is an interesting parallel between how Western thought imagines and structures “art” and how the Western canon imagines and positions non-Western art, particularly African and Latin-American art.

4. When craft art is practiced by white artists, what is the process whereby the work created becomes “art” or a “statement on society”?

“The Beginning” by Jo Hamilton

I’m very interested in “craft” art that is in fact, “art,” in other words, works that require, skill, design, technique, and that represent the expression, vision, or tradition of an individual artist or community. Here , Ithink specifically of the Gee’s Bend quilts, which inspire my own crochet work. Gee’s Bend is located in an isolated region of Alabama, and many of those who lived in Gee’s Bend are direct descendents of the enslaved people from the Gee plantation. After emancipation, many of the former enslaved people became tenant farmers on Pettway land. As the area developed these womyn “developed a distinctive, bold, and sophisticated quilting style based on traditional American (and African American) quilts, but with a geometric simplicity reminiscent of Amish quilts and modern art.” While the website is quick to link the quilts of American styles, even going as far as to cite Amish quilting patterns, it is clear that the patterns in the Gee’s Bend quilts reflect a uniquely African-American aesthestic sense that is directly linked to African art, patterns, and symbology.

The distinctive colors, geometric patterns, shapes – particularly the triangle, are articulated in an African-American context even as the design echoes an African aesthetic.

Lucille Clifton, In memory

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on February 15, 2010 by thebibliophile

Lucille Clifton, poet

come celebrate

with me that everyday

something has tried to

kill me

and has failed

- Lucille Clifton, “won’t you celebrate with me”

Recently I wrote that quote from Clifton’s poem “won’t you celebrate with me,” down so that I could always keep that reminder nearby. Then today, I learned that Lucille Clifton passed away. This makes me sad.

The Prep School Negro

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on February 9, 2010 by thebibliophile

Prep school survivor (and I say this only slightly tongue and cheek as one myself), Andre Robert Lee, who attended the prestigious Germantown Friends School, has recently created and released a documentary about his experience as a student of color at a Phildaelphia-area prep school. The documentary is called The Prep School Negro.

It’s definitely worth checking out – and I think a long time coming. While certainly some of the language (ghetto) and positioning raise an eyebrow for me, I am waiting eagerly to be able to see the documentary. I do believe that students of color’s experience at elite predominantly white institutions, challenges what Lee calls the “racial naivete” of our country.

There is a wildly inaccurate belief that somehow if we all go to school together that issues of race and class are erased. In part, that is the hope and essence of the principals put forth in the landmark Brown case, however, in practice, so very often, the educational system’s biases, whether around race, gender, class, or sexuality impact a student’s experience. Not addressing the very real presence of not only institutional bias, but also the very real existence of bias amidst teachers, students, and parents alike. In truth, part of the experience of being the only student of color at a nearly all-white institution can be amazingly isolating. Assimilation and access is a double-edged sword.

Andre Robert Lee did has been doing interviews about his documentary as well.

Ah….code switching. This is taking me down memory lane, remembering trying to go a week without anyone trying to touch my hair. White dresses and red roses. Wow. Right down memory lane.

The womyn doing the interview “on the stoop,” makes me uncomfortable. I do not appreciate her remark that “you should be paying us for watching since this is therapy for you.” I think that’s a senseless and problematic remark – and I don’t really care that she has an African-American child, that doesn’t reduce her culpability for exeercising white privilege throughout the interview.

My eyebrow raises, if this is going to be a film that suggests that children of color have to be “saved” by the better lives that private school offers – or suggests that all students of color who attend independent schools are from low-income families. Many children of color who attend independent schools, also have parents who are doctors or lawyers – so I truly hope that the film has nuance and doesn’t instead open up a new can of worms.

Love That Dress!

Posted in Uncategorized with tags on February 5, 2010 by thebibliophile

Zac Posen raffia dress. I love it so much I’m not even going to analyze it….

Reading on the Rails: Whiteness, Ability, & Representation

Posted in Uncategorized on February 4, 2010 by thebibliophile
March 2010 Vanity Fair cover

Over at Jezebel they’re covering the new March 2010 cover of Vanity Fair, which inexplicably features no people of color, only waifish and preternaturally pale white womyn. In the post, “Young Hollywood Is White, Thin,” Jezebel points out the misstep of such a cover given that people of color are so prominent this year in Hollywood.           

They also run a pretty compelling run down of Annie Lebowitz’s portraits through the years - all of which mysteriously place people of color on the right side, and thus not quite on the cover (before the fold out), of the photographic frame.Interesting to look at how Vanity Fair featues  white people (light, nature) and how they feature people of color, for instance, Tiger Woods. I will admit that I thought Vanity Fair has done nice images of the Obamas. The picture of Tiger though, gives one things to ponder.           

And because it’s been one of those weeks, there are some things that need special highlighting.          

Over at Resist Racism, there’s a piece on white privilege, called “Racism 101,” that makes me sigh with gratitude . It’s “right-on-it-ness,” and bluntness are a relief. I think everyone should have to read it. My favorite quotes include:              

7. Hating white privilege is not the same as hating whitey.              

8. Defensive responses to issues voiced by people of color are invocations of privilege.               

9. A claim to anti-racism cannot be made based on any variation of the “black friend defense” (Mexican boyfriend, Asian wife, children of color,  etc.)  

10. Apology means say you’re sorry and then shut up. No rationalization, no long explanation of your intention, no invocation of the black friend defense. And then ask what you can do to make change.   

Angry Asian Man posted a great item from Complex Magazine about the “50 Most Racist Movies (You Think Were Racist).” It is a surprisingly thorough and accurate list. What would you add?       

[VENUS-WILLIAMS-AUSTRALIAN-OPEN-PHOTOS.jpg]
Venus Williams at the Australian Open

Over at threadbared, there’s a posting about the fascination with Venus Williams’ Austrialian Open outfit, which she designed herself. The post rightly points to the idiocy of sport personalities who suggested that Venus was not wearing underwear.        The post offers thoughts about why we as a nation still appear so fascinated with the Black female body, making in turn, Venus Williams, suspiciously into another kind of Venus altogether.         The commentary on Venus’ outfit reminds me of the work of The Saartje Project that investigates the portrayal of Black womyn through the theatre arts. They just had a show up called “Deconstructing the Myth of the Booty.”             Colorlines Magazine is discussing the problematic representation issues on Glee in an article called “Glee is Off Key on Race.” Written by Alex Chung the piece has a lot of strong observations about the way in which certain televisions shows co-opt the language of diversity, even while they refuse to offer the people of color complex and full lives.  Chung explains,   

“While it may be easy for some people to dismiss this as “just TV,” all television shows, no matter how fluffy or apolitical, represent a worldview – a sense of the way the world works, and sometimes, a belief in the way that it should work. Television is a more powerful medium than others for transmitting ideas about power and politcs precisely because it requires the viwer to assume certain things to be true. Glee presents a social hierarchy where white men are relatable heroes, women are hysterical banshees and people of color teach lessons to the main white characters.”            The Week  is reporting that Australia is banning ads featuring womyn with small breasts, in order to….wait for it… curb pedophilia. Wow. And yet, “Australia’s Small Breast Ban,” is true.  The ban is crazy and problematic. For sure. I am in no way defending the ban.        

It does make me think however of how many ads with adult womyn, are made to look as if this womyn are children or pre-adolescent, playing with the Lolita image. Here I am thinking specifically of waifish Kate Moss, particularly as she was photographed fro Calvin Klein.   

 The ban is indeed sexist and laden with body politics – and yet, there’s a kernel of a question being asked: what about how media implants the idea of young girls being sexualized? Australia has clearly gone about it the wrong way, but the question: what to do with the sexualization of extreme youth, remains.       

Racialicious posted a beauitful piece by A. Rahman Ford entitled, “Race, Disability, and Denial” confronting disability, gender, and race. It is powerful and a wonderful work that looks at intersections that are not often considered – particularly at disabiliy. The essay is amazing – vulnerable, truthful, painful and hopeful. Ford was inspired in part by a photograph that he took of himself. He says,     

In my own confusing quest for acceptance I could fully embrace being Black, and to a lesser extent being formally educated, but to be disabled was to be diminutive and I could not stand having to crane my neck upward and be forced to be jealous at how tall the world is. I am now coming to realize that there is in fact a difference between being big and being tall. To explore the heights of my own physical vulnerability, I took the photo to make all identities so collectively and simultaneously prominent that I could no longer choose to focus on one and leave another peripheral. 
 
This puts me in mind of my earlier posts about Laura Ferguson and Yinka Shonibare - linking the body, race and sexuality.
 
In fashionista news, I’ve just found a great site, thatblackgirlsite, and they have a great post entitled, “Four Things You Should Never Ask a Fashionista.” They took the words right out of my mouth! I find these questions are even more likely if you are a fashionista of color, in which case, there is a “you are so articulate” effect that happens and all of a sudden people are shocked that you have panache and style. But I digress: why didn’t I know about thatblackgirlsite? My bad, my bad. 

 The Assimilated Negro has some great thoughts about the passing of J.D. Salinger in “Maybe “Illmatic” is Hip-Hop’s Catcher in the Rye. The Assmiliated Negro says,    

Assimilation creates a necessary conflict of values. As we synthesize — hopefully evolve — we are practicing a form of cultural natural selection. As a black kid from the south bronx you might be      taught Salinger, but experience Nas. And ten to fifteen years ago, there was still a pervasive lack of respect for all that noisy hippity hoppity business. Certainly the artists were a far cry from getting covers on Time Magazine. Now over a decade later, it could be time to reassess. As Salinger inspired many in the Mad Men era, hip hop has been the wellspring for so many from media mogul billionaires to the President of the United States. Hip Hop’s history has cred now. It’s genuine Americana. So is Illmatic on the summer listening list at Choate? At a prep school back in the days Illmatic vs. Catcher would have been a joke, now it might very well be a 50-50 proposition in terms of what the student population has been exposed to on their own.   

I appreciate the acknowledgement that assimilation can create a conflict of values. Sure this is like (re)stating the DuBois’ double consciousness; what I find compelling about noting the conflict of values statement is that it acknowledges the confusion of assimilation. Double consciousness certainly nails the feeling of outsider status, or constant vigilance. This statement makes it plain in a heightened way for me.               

If you don’t already know her work, check out dana boyd. She studies social media – and is great.              

Feministing is sharing that Miley Cyrus’ little sister (9-year old sister) is launching a lingerie line…wait for it… for children. And cue apocalyptic mucic to signal the end of days.              

CBS has lost it’s mind – they’re running an anti-abortion ad during the Super Bowl. Jaclyn Freidman wrote about it over at The Nation in a piece called “The Second Sex at the Super Bowl.”                

Also, check out great non-profit leader and thinker Rosetta Thurman, she’s highlighting 28 Black non-profit leaders for the month of February.   

Side note: WordPress formatting is really subpar. 

Happy Black History Month!   

Celebrating Life, Remembering Laura Rothenberg

Posted in Uncategorized on February 3, 2010 by thebibliophile
Laura eats a flower...

Laura Rothenberg

Listen to the Radio Diary of Laura Rothenberg. Recorded when Laura was 21 and planning to return to school for her junior year, in the radio diary, Laura speaks openly about living with cystic fibrosis. Listen to the radio diary here.

Donate to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation here and learn more about cystic fibrosis here.

Terrible Twos: Thebibliophile Turns Two!

Posted in Uncategorized on February 2, 2010 by thebibliophile

Thank you for your support as thebibliophile turns two! And the terrible twos, it shall be – as in the old English use of terrible – meaning to awe and inspire. Yes, I’m kicking it up a notch, focusing on two things this year for thebibliophile:

1. Posting more regularly and balancing analysis with more Op-Ed style writing ( and better editing/proof reading)

2. A possible thebibliophile redesign in the Spring.

Celebrate thebibliophile turning two by donating to the Haiti Relief Fund through the American Red Cross.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.